1 |
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Create like, a table on the Wiki or some kind of metadata property per-package |
4 |
> that can contain a boolean or tri-state flag indicating whether it works or |
5 |
> doesn't work (or kinda works) on split-usr. Or a tracker on Bugzie. Something. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm sure there will be a tracker for packages that don't work on a |
9 |
merged /usr. (We are already on a split /usr.) |
10 |
|
11 |
Honestly, I'm still not quite sure why we're even having this |
12 |
discussion. I don't think anybody actually intends to make any |
13 |
changes at all. If they do, they should issue some kind of plan and |
14 |
indicate what they're looking for from everybody else. |
15 |
|
16 |
Such as: "Hello, I help maintain baselayout and I intend to change |
17 |
/(s)lib and /(s)bin and /usr/sbin into symlinks to /usr/bin and move |
18 |
all the files into those directories there. To test this out now |
19 |
please do xyz, and report any bugs against tracker #123456." |
20 |
|
21 |
Or: "Hello, I help maintain baselayout and I just introduced a new USE |
22 |
flag which does ... I think it is something you should try out. Bugs |
23 |
can be reported at..." |
24 |
|
25 |
Or: "Hello, I think the baselayout maintainers are idiots and I just |
26 |
introduced librelayout which does ... You should definitely switch |
27 |
because only losers run with a split /usr. Bugs can be reported at... |
28 |
Oh, and my fancy librelayout doesn't need gen_usr_ldscript so I |
29 |
select_one_of('won't lift a finger to keep it working', 'will just |
30 |
laugh at the folks who are wasting their time keeping it working')." |
31 |
|
32 |
It seems to me that we're just having a general discussion about the |
33 |
pros/cons of a /usr merge. That is nice, but people are getting |
34 |
worked up because they think that somehow whoever "loses" this |
35 |
"discussion" will get something shoved down their throats or won't be |
36 |
able to have something nice. |
37 |
|
38 |
Almost every big change that has become popular in Gentoo just started |
39 |
out as another alternative, and support grew organically. I don't |
40 |
really see the need to reach some kind of consensus here. I'd love to |
41 |
have an option of a /usr merge and a migration path. I'd love to see |
42 |
it as the default, but that is a different discussion, and if it is |
43 |
optional then it is also a less contentious discussion whichever way |
44 |
it goes. |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Rich |