| 1 |
On 24/02/14 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into systemd! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> - still install udevd into /sbin where a daemon belongs to. |
| 7 |
> - disable the crappy new network naming scheme by default |
| 8 |
> - install the new naming scheme config files into /lib/udev/network/ (version >=209) |
| 9 |
> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd crap. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I have no plans to stop fixing the annoyances the gentoo udev ebuilds have since udev was integrated into systemd in the ebuilds from my overlay. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> <div>-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------</div><div>Von: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> </div><div>Datum:24.02.2014 16:55 (GMT+01:00) </div><div>An: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> </div><div>Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade </div><div> |
| 14 |
> </div>On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whissi@××××××.de> wrote: |
| 15 |
>> Hi, |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have |
| 18 |
>> "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK). |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual |
| 21 |
>> configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will |
| 22 |
>> happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?" |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path for |
| 25 |
>> systemd *and* non-systemd users... |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't want |
| 29 |
> unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
While you're whinging about integration, you're sending bad HTML email. |
Archives