| 1 |
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 26/11/14 22:52, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:34:33 +0000 (UTC) |
| 7 |
>>> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> While it pains me to say this, unfortunately it looks like we have |
| 10 |
>>>> another "toxic person" situation to deal with, with all the |
| 11 |
>>>> implications that come with it. Maybe it's time to deal with it. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Toxic wars have casualties; in one of the sides, or in both of them. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> IOTW; you're already dealing with it, you can only change the outcome. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Can you be clear as to what you're recommending? |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> Are you suggesting that instead of trying to mediate between people |
| 22 |
>> who don't get a long, it would be better to just pick one or the other |
| 23 |
>> as the winner and boot the other out? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> You are missing the point completely. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
You replied to two questions seeking more information with a statement |
| 29 |
that I don't seem to have all the information. I wouldn't have asked |
| 30 |
if I didn't already agree with you before I posted it. :) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
The rest of your post was appreciated. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Rich |
Archives