| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> How the recent changes happened to allow USE flag descriptions in |
| 6 |
> metadata.xml (which I'm not taking any position on now) gave me an idea. |
| 7 |
> The Linux kernel requires that any needed documentation accompany all |
| 8 |
> changes requiring said documentation -- part of the source-code patch |
| 9 |
> must apply to the Documentation/ directory. Should we require that |
| 10 |
> before you commit any changes, you (or someone) write the documentation |
| 11 |
> for them and commit it or submit a patch at the same time? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
We're not talking about ebuilds here, are we? So what ARE we talking about? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Marijn |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML |
| 19 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFHTVPKp/VmCx0OL2wRAoMqAJ4zkrWMSmthzxNNjc+/syiz4EMq2wCcCnSE |
| 25 |
CA8fiI/lq716rIV5+i9r4lI= |
| 26 |
=ypdc |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives