Archives
Archives
| From: | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:13:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5804DC8C.20201@iee.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds by Kristian Fiskerstrand |
||
| 1 | On 17/10/16 15:09, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 | > On 10/17/2016 04:04 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 3 | >> Even if we have a list, what next? There are reasons why they are not packaged |
| 4 | >> from source, and that will not change. Good to be aware, but without any sort |
| 5 | >> of plan or means to address. Not sure it will matter. |
| 6 | > The list would be helpful for discussions in any case to know the scope, |
| 7 | > instead of making mountains out of molehills |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | +1 |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |