Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:09:58
Message-Id: 6e3533c6-814e-d21a-a761-148ad188c5a2@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 10/17/2016 04:04 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > Even if we have a list, what next? There are reasons why they are not packaged
3 > from source, and that will not change. Good to be aware, but without any sort
4 > of plan or means to address. Not sure it will matter.
5
6 The list would be helpful for discussions in any case to know the scope,
7 instead of making mountains out of molehills
8
9 --
10 Kristian Fiskerstrand
11 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
12 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>