Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | ||
| Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 19:07:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070506200238.0f53c92f@snowflake | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:53:22 -0400 |
| 2 | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > > One of the reasons GLEP 42 was necessary was because users *don't* |
| 4 | > > read things delivered by other methods. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > And they are magically going to read the news? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Experience with a reference implementation strongly suggests that yes, |
| 9 | people will read the news. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > I doubt it if it continues to be as trivial as the first suggested |
| 12 | > item. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Paludis users do not consider that news item trivial. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Neil Walker <neil@×××××××.nu> |