| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 08:27 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> (As a second principle, if GLEP 39 is amended, wouldn't it be better |
| 3 |
> to publish a new GLEP to superceed it, rather than revise the existing |
| 4 |
> GLEP?) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Also, I'd like to know what you would propose we do if we were to follow |
| 7 |
something like this. Would we post something like GLEP 39a, as an |
| 8 |
amendment to GLEP 39, or would we have to rewrite the whole thing, with |
| 9 |
just the one change, to supersede? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Perhaps we need an amendment to GLEP 1 to allow explictly-stated |
| 12 |
amendments? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Realize that the new council is trying to both become the leaders of |
| 15 |
Gentoo that so many seem to want, yet also have to balance not |
| 16 |
overstepping the bounds some people think we need. We honestly do need |
| 17 |
everyone's opinions on these things, so thank you for posing yours. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 21 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 22 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 23 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 24 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives