Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for binary-only ebuilds.
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 07:04:02
Message-Id: 20040503070354.GA30066@lion.gg3.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for binary-only ebuilds. by Aron Griffis
1 maillog: 02/05/2004-23:56:10(-0400): Aron Griffis types
2 > Stuart Herbert wrote: [Wed Apr 28 2004, 02:11:21PM EDT]
3 > > Only works if the binary-only package doesn't expect to be in /usr :( NX (for
4 > > example) expects to be in /usr/NX, and I'm not sure what we can do about
5 > > that.
6 >
7 > Considering usr is the same length as opt, you could just edit the
8 > binaries in this case.
9
10 Modifying a binary... wouldn't that violate the license of every possible
11 package out there?
12
13 --
14 (* Georgi Georgiev (* Money is better than poverty, if only for (*
15 *) chutz@×××.net *) financial reasons. *)
16 (* +81(90)6266-1163 (* (*

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for binary-only ebuilds. Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>