| 1 |
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:41:12 +0200 |
| 2 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Jeroen Roovers kirjoitti: |
| 5 |
> > On 01 Mar 2008 05:30:01 |
| 6 |
> > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically |
| 9 |
> >> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel |
| 10 |
> >> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |
| 13 |
> >> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |
| 14 |
> >> Gentoo dev list to see. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > The list of architectures that Gentoo supports is one of its |
| 17 |
> > greatest assets. It is important that Gentoo makes available an as |
| 18 |
> > large as possible set of packages to as many platforms as is sanely |
| 19 |
> > doable. For this purpose we have a testing and stabilisation system |
| 20 |
> > that depends on architecture keywords being propagated from one |
| 21 |
> > version to the next. I would like to stress to all package |
| 22 |
> > maintainers that dropping keywords, i.e. removing any |
| 23 |
> > architecture's keyword entirely, instead of replacing "arch" with |
| 24 |
> > "~arch", _hurts_ the Gentoo Project. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I couldn't find in your post what you want the council to discuss? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
One current and pressing issue. Neatly explained, a solution thought |
| 30 |
through and well layed out. As a Council you'd only need to lay down |
| 31 |
the law. |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives