1 |
Jeroen Roovers kirjoitti: |
2 |
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:41:12 +0200 |
3 |
> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Jeroen Roovers kirjoitti: |
6 |
>>> On 01 Mar 2008 05:30:01 |
7 |
>>> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically |
10 |
>>>> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel |
11 |
>>>> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |
14 |
>>>> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |
15 |
>>>> Gentoo dev list to see. |
16 |
>>> The list of architectures that Gentoo supports is one of its |
17 |
>>> greatest assets. It is important that Gentoo makes available an as |
18 |
>>> large as possible set of packages to as many platforms as is sanely |
19 |
>>> doable. For this purpose we have a testing and stabilisation system |
20 |
>>> that depends on architecture keywords being propagated from one |
21 |
>>> version to the next. I would like to stress to all package |
22 |
>>> maintainers that dropping keywords, i.e. removing any |
23 |
>>> architecture's keyword entirely, instead of replacing "arch" with |
24 |
>>> "~arch", _hurts_ the Gentoo Project. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>> I couldn't find in your post what you want the council to discuss? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> One current and pressing issue. Neatly explained, a solution thought |
29 |
> through and well layed out. As a Council you'd only need to lay down |
30 |
> the law. |
31 |
|
32 |
Isn't what you wrote the existing policy? |
33 |
|
34 |
Regards, |
35 |
Petteri |