1 |
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:00:56 +0200 |
3 |
> Thierry Carrez <koon@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Excerpt from the metastructure model, chosen by the majority of devs |
6 |
>> last year (and not my model): |
7 |
>> [...] |
8 |
>> * It may have one or many leads, and the leads are selected by the |
9 |
>> members of the project. This selection must occur at least once every |
10 |
>> 12 months, and may occur at any time. |
11 |
>> [...] |
12 |
> |
13 |
> While we're on the subject of the metastructure model, could we |
14 |
> consider changing this rule? It's a little strict, and I suspect it's |
15 |
> honoured more in the breach than otherwise (by which I mean some, |
16 |
> perhaps many, projects don't bother to hold a selection process every 12 |
17 |
> months). The 12 month rule makes perfect sense for the council and |
18 |
> foundation trustees but it's over the top as a rule for all |
19 |
> projects. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I would suggest something along the lines of, "selection of |
22 |
> leadership of a project can occur at any time, but can be forced should |
23 |
> a majority of the team feel a new selection is necessary", perhaps |
24 |
> with a rider allowing projects to setup stricter rules if they feel the |
25 |
> need. I'm assuming (since I haven't checked) that project membership |
26 |
> requires agreement of the project (i.e. people can't just join a |
27 |
> project without the existing project members' agreement). |
28 |
> |
29 |
> The idea being that if the current leadership want to step down they |
30 |
> can do so and selection occurs within the project by default. At the |
31 |
> other extreme, if a lead becomes a pita for everyone else on the |
32 |
> project, the rest of the project can oust the lead by majority |
33 |
> decision (hopefully a rare occurrence). |
34 |
|
35 |
One nice thing about the 12-month model is that it's harder to get on |
36 |
bad terms with a lead that you'd rather wasn't the lead anymore. It's |
37 |
less of a feeling of conspiring to oust them and more of a feeling of |
38 |
"Well, they didn't win the election this time around." |
39 |
|
40 |
However, it's easy to avoid the election if nobody else accepts a |
41 |
nomination, as happened in the desktop project. That saves all the hassle. |
42 |
|
43 |
Thanks, |
44 |
Donnie |