| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:52:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:29:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:11:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:45:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise |
Markos Chandras |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:22:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:56:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki |
Markos Chandras |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:10:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/twiki |
Markos Chandras |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:10:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:25:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:19:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:06:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:34:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:11:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:12:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:56:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:50:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:44:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:29:26 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:15:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:08:58 |
| [gentoo-dev] unpacker.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:06:09 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: New eclass: mozlinguas.eclass |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:26:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:28:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? |
Matthew Thode |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:35:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? |
ScytheMan |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:43:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:17:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: FlowScan, CUFlow, and JKFlow |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:13:44 |
| [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:03:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? |
Anthony G. Basile |
Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:59:29 |
Archives