Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] Review of Documentation Policy
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:23:08
Message-Id: 20110923172237.6b565b10@angelstorm
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-doc] Review of Documentation Policy by Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:49:25 +0000
Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> wrote:

> Okay, I have a suggestion for the Gentoo Documentation Project > Policy. The suggested document can be found at [1], the diff output > at [2]. > > [1] > [2] > > Feedback is, as always, very much appreciated. Joshua, especially > from you (I definitely do not want to touch that guide without your > blessing ;-)
Thanks for the draft! From a quick run-through of the patch (much obliged for that, thanks), it seems pretty good. The major differences to the original doc are: 1. Doing away with the Strategic/Operational lead split. We haven't had two people doing those jobs in 5 years, anyway. 2. Translation project leads and "official" language status. Any comments as to the changes here? 3. Join-up process. No formal "X number of contributions per period Y." Works well enough for me, but then "how much does this potential recruit actually do for us" becomes subjective hand-waving. We would need a new metric to determine commitment over time. Ideas? Anyway, if you can clarify your thinking on these 3 points, just so I know where you're coming from, I'm fine with the proposed update. How about the other GDP members -- any thoughts from the rest of you?


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-doc] Review of Documentation Policy Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>