1 |
Hi all, |
2 |
|
3 |
With the Gentoo Wiki being the sole handler of all end user (and often also |
4 |
development, although the Devmanual is a separate aspect but not under |
5 |
Documentation project anyway) we had a small talk on #gentoo-doc if there |
6 |
was still a need to have the documentation project as an active project. |
7 |
|
8 |
Because, you know, we're not active (beyond the wiki, which is doing great |
9 |
btw). |
10 |
|
11 |
I've been looking at what the project would still mean for Gentoo right now, |
12 |
and if that would be sufficient to keep it alive. We |
13 |
- have some documentation development guidelines as part of the |
14 |
Project:Documentation umbrella (but which can be moved if needed) |
15 |
- the translation subproject underneath (but again only with a guideline for |
16 |
translations) |
17 |
|
18 |
And that's basically not much, and a good reflection of how things evolved |
19 |
in the past few years. Just keeping it in limbo doesn't serve us well. It's |
20 |
a somewhat empty project, with its deliverables being implemented elsewhere. |
21 |
So it's definitely not a failure, on the contrary. It's finished. |
22 |
|
23 |
So personally, I wouldn't mind that we move whatever is still needed to the |
24 |
right location (Project:Wiki most likely) and clean up (or archive if |
25 |
needed) the rest. |
26 |
|
27 |
But I'm also all ears for people who have some neat and innovative ideas to |
28 |
do through the documentation project! So, what's your take on this? |
29 |
|
30 |
Wkr, |
31 |
Sven Vermeulen |