| 1 |
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:48:52AM +0000, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> wireless posted on Fri, 06 Dec 2013 17:12:35 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > I understand your concerns. The goals is to do this now, to flesh out, |
| 5 |
> > the issues, so when btrfs becomes "stable" there is a simple guide for |
| 6 |
> > adventurous, but ordinary users to follow. Also, a dual hope that |
| 7 |
> > supporting btrfs, formally in the handbook, become a reality. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> That's a worthwhile goal, I'll agree. =:^) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> And I really do expect btrfs to be calming down (it is already, it's just |
| 12 |
> not /calm/ yet) next year, such that by this time next year, I believe/ |
| 13 |
> hope my opinion will be different, that it /is/ ready. And having the |
| 14 |
> proposed changes hammered out and real deployment tested when that |
| 15 |
> happens is indeed a good thing. Thanks! =:^) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If I'm not mistaken, RedHat is hoping to include Btrfs as a stable file |
| 18 |
system for RHEL7. Although I'm not going to use Btrfs for our databases soon |
| 19 |
;-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Anyway, there is already some documentation on Btrfs on |
| 22 |
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Btrfs so it might make sense to improve that |
| 23 |
documentation. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Wkr, |
| 26 |
Sven Vermeulen |
Archives