| 1 |
wireless posted on Fri, 06 Dec 2013 17:12:35 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I understand your concerns. The goals is to do this now, to flesh out, |
| 4 |
> the issues, so when btrfs becomes "stable" there is a simple guide for |
| 5 |
> adventurous, but ordinary users to follow. Also, a dual hope that |
| 6 |
> supporting btrfs, formally in the handbook, become a reality. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
That's a worthwhile goal, I'll agree. =:^) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
And I really do expect btrfs to be calming down (it is already, it's just |
| 11 |
not /calm/ yet) next year, such that by this time next year, I believe/ |
| 12 |
hope my opinion will be different, that it /is/ ready. And having the |
| 13 |
proposed changes hammered out and real deployment tested when that |
| 14 |
happens is indeed a good thing. Thanks! =:^) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 18 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 19 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives