Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] frontend needed to make Gentoo/embedded a viability
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 08:44:57
Message-Id: 1155458628.6438.38.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-embedded] frontend needed to make Gentoo/embedded a viability by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 19:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > so i was tooling along the road thinking about what it would take for people
3 > to sit down and use Gentoo/embedded for the target ... currently we have misc
4 > ways of doing this by hand (install mask/etc...), but it tends to be error
5 > prone and it requires the end user to know more than they should about the
6 > portage environment
7 >
8 > what would help here is a frontend ... something like uClinux or Open Embedded
9 > where a menu system allows the user to select the packages to install into
10 > the target image and when they're done, they simply type 'make' ... wait a
11 > bit and they're left with images that they can take and flash onto the target
12 > board
13 >
14 > so really, a friendly frontend for the user to select the characteristics of
15 > the system, and then a backend to take that config and use emerge to build
16 > everything and generate an image ... would make it easy to create stock board
17 > descriptions too ...
18 >
19 > what do you guys think ? stupid idea ?
20
21 Not silly.. I'd tie it into (lx)dialog/Xdialog and skip anything to do
22 with catalyst as it tends to be cumbersome for embedded use (plus GNAP
23 already exists). using the classic dialog method will provide the most
24 familiarity to what buildroot users already expect.
25 Then again I'm rather also fond of using single meta ebuilds to handle
26 everything but that requires calling emerge from within an ebuild.
27
28 > good idea waiting for a champion ?
29
30 pretty much..
31
32
33
34 --
35 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
36 Gentoo Linux
37
38 --
39 gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies