1 |
What about a bootchart? Is there one available? |
2 |
|
3 |
My system is a normal stripped down gentoo install (for now). I'm |
4 |
making some scripts to make the build process automatic in a build |
5 |
host and create a tarball with it. My pc doesn't boot from cd-rom... |
6 |
:( (When i'm satisfied with the results i'll post an how-to at |
7 |
gentoo-wiki. :) ). So what i want is stability and boot up speed. |
8 |
I don't test initng for a while, and when i did i didn't had good |
9 |
results, but for what i want it _may_ be good enough, but if the boot |
10 |
time is similar to your baselayout, i'll use it instead... |
11 |
|
12 |
In the mean time, what you want to say with "But its designed to load |
13 |
binary packages to ram |
14 |
during boot, LEAF style." ? |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Thanks! |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
2006/6/28, Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@×××××.com>: |
24 |
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 07:46 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: |
25 |
> > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 11:09 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: |
26 |
> > > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:53 +0100, Marcelo Coelho wrote: |
27 |
> > > > > no not at all. the baselayout-lite one does not depend on bash what so |
28 |
> > > > > ever and includes pretty much no init/conf scripts. You get to hack on |
29 |
> > > > > your own init scripts, which is a trivial task. |
30 |
> > > > |
31 |
> > > > Well, i have to use a different baselayout. The boot time is far too |
32 |
> > > > long to be acceptable and there is a problem with hotplug (an error |
33 |
> > > > appears that the firmware isn't available). But i don't know if it's |
34 |
> > > > easier to make my init scripts or use initng. |
35 |
> > > |
36 |
> > > I have made a baselyaout with a stripped down version of runscript that |
37 |
> > > will run the many init.d script from gentoo out of the box. |
38 |
> > > |
39 |
> > > Let me know if you are interested and I'll send you the sources |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > Does not depend on bash? |
43 |
> |
44 |
> no |
45 |
> |
46 |
> > Works with ash? :) |
47 |
> |
48 |
> yes :) |
49 |
> |
50 |
> or... I'm actually using dash currently because coldplugging takes like |
51 |
> 3 minutes with ash and 5 seconds with dash. (its fixed in next release |
52 |
> of busybox so I'll drop dash) |
53 |
> |
54 |
> > If so I think we would all be interested in moving fwd in that |
55 |
> > direction. Feel like putting together an updated baselayout-lite ebuild? |
56 |
> |
57 |
> I have one already. But its designed to load binary packages to ram |
58 |
> during boot, LEAF style. |
59 |
> |
60 |
> rsync://tanael.org/alpine-portage/sys-apps/baselayout-alpine/ |
61 |
> |
62 |
> You can probably reuse parts of it. The source package is here: |
63 |
> http://tanael.org/alpine/baselayout-alpine/baselayout-alpine-0.9.6.tar.gz |
64 |
> |
65 |
> I kind of immitate runlevels, (using rc0.d, rc1.d etc) but the big |
66 |
> difference from normal sysv is that *all* runlevels or "boot stages" are |
67 |
> executed. |
68 |
> |
69 |
> I had to patch some of the init.d scripts. Typically it was replacing: |
70 |
> |
71 |
> if [ expr && expr ] ... |
72 |
> |
73 |
> with: |
74 |
> |
75 |
> if [ expr ] && [ expr ] ... |
76 |
> |
77 |
> If we could get the init.d script writers to try to not be too bashish, |
78 |
> it would be great. |
79 |
> |
80 |
> If there is interrest I could dump my patches somwhere. |
81 |
> |
82 |
> If you want to see it in action, try: |
83 |
> http://tanael.org/alpine/v1.1/iso/alpine-1.1.3_beta8-060622-i386.iso |
84 |
> |
85 |
> Its 125Mb |
86 |
> |
87 |
> |
88 |
> -- |
89 |
> gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
90 |
> |
91 |
> |
92 |
-- |
93 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |