| 1 |
Thanks a lot, all you guys!! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'll consider the serial interface suggestion and try to put a RTLinux |
| 4 |
to work in one machine and RTAI on another and try to figure out how |
| 5 |
they work ;-) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Francisco |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Grant Likely wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>On 5/12/05, Francisco Ares <frares@×××××××××.br> wrote: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>>Anything in portage? Could not find it yet. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>>And I have some doubts, if anyone could point me to some links, |
| 18 |
>>specially benchmarks, I would really appreciate: |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>>How do I no if need a real time OS? |
| 21 |
>>Should I rely only on the preemptibility of the 2.6 kernels? |
| 22 |
>>Which real time Linux flavor is best for which types of applications? |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>There are two primary sources for hard real time while running a Linux |
| 27 |
>kernel. RTLinux and RTAI. Both solve the problem by using an RTOS |
| 28 |
>kernel and running the Linux kernel as a low priority task. Any Linux |
| 29 |
>distribution can be used with an RTLinux or RTAI enabled kernel. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
>A quick google will locate the RTLinux and RTAI resources on the web. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
>g. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives