1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
I would strongly advice you to use RTAI since RTLinux does not evolve |
4 |
anymore and for thios reason migrations to RTAI from communauty |
5 |
is on the way (The rtlinux free edition is outdated) |
6 |
For RTAI I would suggest you first to download an RTAI trial cdrom |
7 |
available on the web. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
Best Regards |
11 |
Steph |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
Francisco Ares wrote: |
17 |
|
18 |
>Thanks a lot, all you guys!! |
19 |
> |
20 |
>I'll consider the serial interface suggestion and try to put a RTLinux |
21 |
>to work in one machine and RTAI on another and try to figure out how |
22 |
>they work ;-) |
23 |
> |
24 |
>Francisco |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
>Grant Likely wrote: |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
>>On 5/12/05, Francisco Ares <frares@×××××××××.br> wrote: |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>>>Anything in portage? Could not find it yet. |
37 |
>>> |
38 |
>>>And I have some doubts, if anyone could point me to some links, |
39 |
>>>specially benchmarks, I would really appreciate: |
40 |
>>> |
41 |
>>>How do I no if need a real time OS? |
42 |
>>>Should I rely only on the preemptibility of the 2.6 kernels? |
43 |
>>>Which real time Linux flavor is best for which types of applications? |
44 |
>>> |
45 |
>>> |
46 |
>>> |
47 |
>>> |
48 |
>>> |
49 |
>>There are two primary sources for hard real time while running a Linux |
50 |
>>kernel. RTLinux and RTAI. Both solve the problem by using an RTOS |
51 |
>>kernel and running the Linux kernel as a low priority task. Any Linux |
52 |
>>distribution can be used with an RTLinux or RTAI enabled kernel. |
53 |
>> |
54 |
>>A quick google will locate the RTLinux and RTAI resources on the web. |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>>g. |
57 |
>> |
58 |
>> |
59 |
>> |
60 |
>> |
61 |
>> |
62 |
-- |
63 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |