Re: [gentoo-embedded] bug introduced in GCC patches

[Ned Ludd]

This absolutely should be reported to toolchain@gentoo via
https://bugs.gentoo.org


On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 05:05 +0100, Christopher Friedt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering if I should submit a bug report for
> sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 on Gentoo's main bugzilla -
>
> it's exactly the same problem found here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422971
>
> and I've traced it to
>
> gcc-4.1.2-patches-1.0.2.tar.bz2/patch/62_all_gcc4-noteGNUstack.patch
>
>
> Incorrect:
> ===================================================================
> --- libffi/src/arm/sysv.S.jj	2004-10-28 15:10:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ libffi/src/arm/sysv.S	2005-02-08 16:14:02.282767581 +0100
> @@ -207,3 +207,6 @@ LSYM(Lepilogue):
>   .ffi_call_SYSV_end:
>           .size
> CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV),.ffi_call_SYSV_end-CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV)
>
> +#if defined __ELF__ && defined __linux__
> +	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
> +#endif
> ===================================================================
> Correct:
> ===================================================================
> --- libffi/src/arm/sysv.S.jj	2004-10-28 15:10:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ libffi/src/arm/sysv.S	2005-02-08 16:14:02.282767581 +0100
> @@ -207,3 +207,6 @@ LSYM(Lepilogue):
>   .ffi_call_SYSV_end:
>           .size
> CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV),.ffi_call_SYSV_end-CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV)
>
> +#if defined __ELF__ && defined __linux__
> +	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits
> +#endif
> ===================================================================
>
> There are several similar patches in that file, and they all share the
> same syntax, so I would imagine that all of the lines containing
>
> +	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
>
> are incorrect in the whole patch file, but I cannot confirm.
>
> ~/Chris

-- 
gentoo-embedded@l.g.o mailing list