| 1 |
Hi Ned, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I think it's been assigned to the toolchain folks already, but it's in |
| 4 |
bugzilla at any rate: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206525 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Incidentally, there has been some talk that the included fastjar sources |
| 9 |
have been taken out of upstream gcc, and they've resorted to using an |
| 10 |
existing fastjar or jar detected by configure. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q1/msg00381.html |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I have a patch for gcc-4.1.2 to enable that as well. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
http://vaiprime.visibleassets.com/~cfriedt/patches/gcc-4.1.2-externalize-jar.patch |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
When I tried to build with java support it failed all of the time before |
| 19 |
I applied this patch. I guess the downside is that you'd need an |
| 20 |
existing fastjar or jar binary on your build system. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Cheers, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Chris |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 27 |
> This absolutely should be reported to toolchain@gentoo via |
| 28 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 05:05 +0100, Christopher Friedt wrote: |
| 32 |
>> Hi, |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> I was just wondering if I should submit a bug report for |
| 35 |
>> sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 on Gentoo's main bugzilla - |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> it's exactly the same problem found here: |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422971 |
| 40 |
>> |
| 41 |
>> and I've traced it to |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
>> gcc-4.1.2-patches-1.0.2.tar.bz2/patch/62_all_gcc4-noteGNUstack.patch |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
>> Incorrect: |
| 47 |
>> =================================================================== |
| 48 |
>> --- libffi/src/arm/sysv.S.jj 2004-10-28 15:10:11.000000000 +0200 |
| 49 |
>> +++ libffi/src/arm/sysv.S 2005-02-08 16:14:02.282767581 +0100 |
| 50 |
>> @@ -207,3 +207,6 @@ LSYM(Lepilogue): |
| 51 |
>> .ffi_call_SYSV_end: |
| 52 |
>> .size |
| 53 |
>> CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV),.ffi_call_SYSV_end-CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV) |
| 54 |
>> |
| 55 |
>> +#if defined __ELF__ && defined __linux__ |
| 56 |
>> + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits |
| 57 |
>> +#endif |
| 58 |
>> =================================================================== |
| 59 |
>> Correct: |
| 60 |
>> =================================================================== |
| 61 |
>> --- libffi/src/arm/sysv.S.jj 2004-10-28 15:10:11.000000000 +0200 |
| 62 |
>> +++ libffi/src/arm/sysv.S 2005-02-08 16:14:02.282767581 +0100 |
| 63 |
>> @@ -207,3 +207,6 @@ LSYM(Lepilogue): |
| 64 |
>> .ffi_call_SYSV_end: |
| 65 |
>> .size |
| 66 |
>> CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV),.ffi_call_SYSV_end-CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV) |
| 67 |
>> |
| 68 |
>> +#if defined __ELF__ && defined __linux__ |
| 69 |
>> + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits |
| 70 |
>> +#endif |
| 71 |
>> =================================================================== |
| 72 |
>> |
| 73 |
>> There are several similar patches in that file, and they all share the |
| 74 |
>> same syntax, so I would imagine that all of the lines containing |
| 75 |
>> |
| 76 |
>> + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits |
| 77 |
>> |
| 78 |
>> are incorrect in the whole patch file, but I cannot confirm. |
| 79 |
>> |
| 80 |
>> ~/Chris |
| 81 |
> |
| 82 |
-- |
| 83 |
gentoo-embedded@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives