Gentoo Archives: gentoo-genkernel

From: Richard Farina <sidhayn@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-genkernel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-genkernel] blkid
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 20:23:07
Message-Id: 4FB80127.5000507@hotmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-genkernel] blkid by Richard Farina
1 On 05/19/12 13:39, Richard Farina wrote:
2 > On 05/19/12 11:49, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
3 >> Hello Richard,
4 >>
5 >>
6 >>
7 >> On 05/19/2012 05:33 PM, Richard Farina wrote:
8 >>> Why was blkid removed from 3.4.32->3.4.33.1 ?
9 >>
10 >> It wasn't actually removed, it was replaced by blkid of util-linux.
11 >> Does that answer the question already?
12 >
13 > Ahh, my mistake, that's why I missed it, I was only really concerned
14 > with the loss of e2fsprogs
15 >>
16 >> It was a mix of reasons:
17 >>
18 >> - Someone wanted nilfs recognition which blkid of util-linux has more
19 >> than that of e2fsprogs
20 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390635
21 >>
22 >> - The version of util-linux seemed superior to the one from e2fsprogs
23 >> https://blog.hartwork.org/?p=1739
24 >>
25 >> - The new copy_binaries function allows us to use non-static binaries
26 >> where it makes sense
27 >>
28 >> - It made future maintenance of genkernel a bit easier
29 >>
30 >>
31 >>> Not that I care specifically about blkid but my aufs patches which I was
32 >>> about to submit need e2fsprogs
33 >>
34 >> What do they need it for? Is it needed _in_ the initramfs?
35 >>
36 > I need e2fsck and mke2fs _in_ initramfs for changes saving partition
37 > support on aufs. This is my patch which applies cleanly against 3.4.32
38 > (which by the way doesn't work at all, something about /sbin/mingetty
39 > missing but I'm sure you already fixed that):
40 Please ignore the /sbin/mingetty part, that is totally my fault, it just
41 happened to randomly show up at the same time and is COMPLETELY unrelated.
42
43 Thanks,
44 Zero
45 >
46 > https://code.google.com/p/pentoo/source/browse/portage/trunk/sys-kernel/genkernel/files/aufs-changes-e2fsprogs-2.diff
47 >
48 > If util-linux has e2fsck and mke2fs I'd be happy to make the needed
49 > changes, but I don't see anything usable when I qlist util-linux.
50 >
51 > Please let me know how you would prefer I proceed (just don't suggest
52 > that I break the aufs stuff up because I'm far more likely to break it
53 > than submit working chunks of code.).
54 >
55 > thanks,
56 > Zero
57 >> Best,
58 >>
59 >>
60 >>
61 >> Sebastian
62 >>
63 >>
64 >