1 |
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 10:17 -0600, Brian Kroth wrote: |
2 |
> Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@×××××.com>: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 09:26 -0600, Brian Kroth wrote: |
5 |
> > > pageexec@××××××××.hu <pageexec@××××××××.hu>: |
6 |
> > > > so i figured it all out, a new pax test is waiting for you in my test dir. |
7 |
> > > > i can now run cactid forever without triggering the bad page message, i |
8 |
> > > > hope it'll work there as well ;-). |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Been running cactid non-stop on this as well as other services for the |
11 |
> > > past couple of days without a single complaint, so I think it's pretty |
12 |
> > > stable. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > any chance to get this fix into gentoo portage? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> I can make a new ebuild tonight or tomorrow, but someone else would have |
17 |
> to approve it. Also, I did this test on 2.6.23.1, so I'd have to run |
18 |
> the test again against 2.6.22 if people are unwilling to bump that high |
19 |
> yet. I think pageexec said that nothing changed on his end between |
20 |
> 2.6.22 and 2.6.23. |
21 |
|
22 |
is there a bug # for this? |
23 |
|
24 |
thanks! |
25 |
|
26 |
-nc |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |