Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@×××××.com>
To: Brian Kroth <bpkroth@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] kernel upgrade problems: bad page state
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:08:55
Message-Id: 1195412719.11357.6.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] kernel upgrade problems: bad page state by Brian Kroth
1 On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 10:17 -0600, Brian Kroth wrote:
2 > Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@×××××.com>:
3 > >
4 > > On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 09:26 -0600, Brian Kroth wrote:
5 > > > pageexec@××××××××.hu <pageexec@××××××××.hu>:
6 > > > > so i figured it all out, a new pax test is waiting for you in my test dir.
7 > > > > i can now run cactid forever without triggering the bad page message, i
8 > > > > hope it'll work there as well ;-).
9 > > >
10 > > > Been running cactid non-stop on this as well as other services for the
11 > > > past couple of days without a single complaint, so I think it's pretty
12 > > > stable.
13 > >
14 > > any chance to get this fix into gentoo portage?
15 > >
16 > I can make a new ebuild tonight or tomorrow, but someone else would have
17 > to approve it. Also, I did this test on 2.6.23.1, so I'd have to run
18 > the test again against 2.6.22 if people are unwilling to bump that high
19 > yet. I think pageexec said that nothing changed on his end between
20 > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23.
21
22 is there a bug # for this?
23
24 thanks!
25
26 -nc
27
28 --
29 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list