| 1 |
On 01/04/2013 12:44 PM, vivo75@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> Il 04/01/2013 16:51, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto: |
| 3 |
>> On 01/04/2013 07:11 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 4 |
>>>> You also mention adding the overlay and "make sure you set up your |
| 5 |
>>>> repos.conf." I'm just not sure what you mean there, I've never used |
| 6 |
>>>> repos.conf for anything. What am I supposed to do with it? |
| 7 |
>>> In /etc/portage/repos.conf you should add |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> [DEFAULT] |
| 10 |
>>> class-overrides = hardened-dev |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> This causes the eclass from the overlay to override the default eclass |
| 13 |
>>> from the portage tree. man portage and you'll see. I'll add a blurb |
| 14 |
>>> about it in the howto. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> Ah, I see. Otherwise the hardened-dev ebuilds would use the hardened-dev |
| 17 |
>> eclass, but ebuilds from other repos would use their own copy (or the |
| 18 |
>> default copy). |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> I'm not sure this is still the case, somewhere in the internet is |
| 22 |
> written that now priority is given from the order of appareance in the |
| 23 |
> $PORTDIR_OVERLAY. |
| 24 |
> with the leftmost being the lowest priority and the rightmost the higher |
| 25 |
> priority. |
| 26 |
> Cannot give much more explanation, maybe portage guys can (including |
| 27 |
> history hopefully) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> regards, |
| 30 |
> Francesco R. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
You know, I haven't jumped into the code, but I've notice some "strange" |
| 33 |
behavior with respect to stacking of overlays and eclasses. I |
| 34 |
personally think overlays are not a good idea anyhow and are okay just |
| 35 |
for testing and play. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. |
| 39 |
Chair of Information Technology |
| 40 |
D'Youville College |
| 41 |
Buffalo, NY 14201 |
| 42 |
(716) 829-8197 |
Archives