| 1 |
solar wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>http://bugs.gentoo.org (file for kang@ CC: hardened@) |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 19:02 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>>Hi, |
| 10 |
>>Went on trying the latest RSBAC-1.2.5 with kernel-2.6.13. |
| 11 |
>>The kernel part went OK (except for the PaX-patch). |
| 12 |
>>Emerged rsbac-admin-1.2.5 (it's in testing ~x86) wo looking at it. |
| 13 |
>>It compiled OK, only i saw an error while looking at the passing lines. |
| 14 |
>>True, there was an error (in NSS-part) dug into autotools-jungle but |
| 15 |
>>later had a look (a diff really) between 1.2.4 <-> 1.2.5, too many |
| 16 |
>>diffs. |
| 17 |
>>Seems 1.2.5 is just being made now, but it doesn't even work (missing |
| 18 |
>>elibtoolize parts,dependency on rsbac-sources etc.) so it can't be in |
| 19 |
>>~x86. |
| 20 |
>>PS: IIRC i synced (portage) earlier today. |
| 21 |
>>Thanks.Rumen |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Please make a bug report, yes. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Else to answer you, I do not understand what you say as: |
| 30 |
- rsbac 1.2.5 tools do not make use of auto-tools at all |
| 31 |
- rsbac 1.2.5 does not depend on rsbac-sources (it can self compile now) |
| 32 |
- rsbac-sources kernel for 1.2.5 has been uploaded at the same time (it |
| 33 |
has kernel 2.6.13 and pax btw) |
| 34 |
- rsbac 1.2.5 is not being made, it has been released. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
however please paste your emerge log and everything into a new bug if |
| 37 |
you still encounter a problem. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
refs: |
| 40 |
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-admin-1.2.5 |
| 41 |
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.6.13 |
| 42 |
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.4.31 |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives