Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Rumen Yotov <rumen_yotov@×××.bg>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] please hard mask rsbac-admin-1.2.5
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:36:21
Message-Id: 20051011203646.26fdb8f7@mach.qrypto.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] please hard mask rsbac-admin-1.2.5 by kang
1 On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:05:10 +0200
2 kang <kang@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > solar wrote:
5 >
6 > >http://bugs.gentoo.org (file for kang@ CC: hardened@)
7 > >
8 > >
9 > >On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 19:02 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote:
10 > >
11 > >
12 > >>Hi,
13 > >>Went on trying the latest RSBAC-1.2.5 with kernel-2.6.13.
14 > >>The kernel part went OK (except for the PaX-patch).
15 > >>Emerged rsbac-admin-1.2.5 (it's in testing ~x86) wo looking at it.
16 > >>It compiled OK, only i saw an error while looking at the passing
17 > >>lines. True, there was an error (in NSS-part) dug into
18 > >>autotools-jungle but later had a look (a diff really) between 1.2.4
19 > >><-> 1.2.5, too many diffs.
20 > >>Seems 1.2.5 is just being made now, but it doesn't even work
21 > >>(missing elibtoolize parts,dependency on rsbac-sources etc.) so it
22 > >>can't be in ~x86.
23 > >>PS: IIRC i synced (portage) earlier today.
24 > >>Thanks.Rumen
25 > >>
26 > >>
27 > >
28 > >
29 > >
30 > Please make a bug report, yes.
31 >
32 > Else to answer you, I do not understand what you say as:
33 > - rsbac 1.2.5 tools do not make use of auto-tools at all
34 > - rsbac 1.2.5 does not depend on rsbac-sources (it can self compile
35 > now)
36 > - rsbac-sources kernel for 1.2.5 has been uploaded at the same time
37 > (it has kernel 2.6.13 and pax btw)
38 > - rsbac 1.2.5 is not being made, it has been released.
39 >
40 > however please paste your emerge log and everything into a new bug if
41 > you still encounter a problem.
42 >
43 > refs:
44 > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-admin-1.2.5
45 > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.6.13
46 > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?rsbac-sources-2.4.31
47 Hi,
48 Sorry for the confusion, forgot to check for rsbac-sources in "testing"
49 first, instead got the tarball from the site (rsbac.org) and manually
50 tried applying the test12 PaX-patch (later saw there was such a kernel
51 in fixed). Went along wo PaX.
52 For about a week reading the rsbac docs, no info about
53 rsbac-admin not depending on rsbac-sources, assume my mistake here too.
54 The error appears while compiling NNS module in tools directory, with a
55 libtool related error (search for GCC-3.3.5) in a "nss*.la" file.
56 Posted only because rsbac-admin-1.2.5 compiled wo any visible error,
57 while there was such with NSS (later saw you not using "epatch ... ||
58 die "..." in 1.2.5 ebuild). The error is in my emerge logs.
59 IIRC i'm using GCC-3.4.4 (writing this from my non-hardened install).
60 Thanks again. Will check all things again and file a Bug (if needed).
61 Rumen

Replies