1 |
On 20 Jul 2004 15:40:38 -0400 |
2 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 14:45, pageexec@××××××××.hu wrote: |
5 |
> > > Ok, I've reemerged glibc with debugging and tried again, cheers |
6 |
> > > (maybe a new doc is called for, Debugging for the Clueless ;) |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > hmm, still no love from gdb/debug symbols, i wonder whether we have |
9 |
> > a problem with gdb now (i don't get debug info either here with |
10 |
> > gdb 6.1.1 and a PIE cpufreqd, however it works with a normal |
11 |
> > executable). |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > anyway, i think the segfault most likely occurs in libdl.so, but |
14 |
> > i have no idea what exactly is wrong. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > i suggest that for now you |
18 |
> > (and gentoo) not compile this package as PIE. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> 1.1.2 was released on 2004-03-09 |
21 |
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=358635 |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I just added this to portage with use pie && append-flags -fno-pie to |
24 |
> enable this workaround logic. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
Thanks for your help everyone, should I still submit a bug report? |
28 |
|
29 |
Barry |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |