| 1 |
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 16:07, Barry Dunn wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 20 Jul 2004 15:40:38 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 14:45, pageexec@××××××××.hu wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > Ok, I've reemerged glibc with debugging and tried again, cheers |
| 7 |
> > > > (maybe a new doc is called for, Debugging for the Clueless ;) |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > hmm, still no love from gdb/debug symbols, i wonder whether we have |
| 10 |
> > > a problem with gdb now (i don't get debug info either here with |
| 11 |
> > > gdb 6.1.1 and a PIE cpufreqd, however it works with a normal |
| 12 |
> > > executable). |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > anyway, i think the segfault most likely occurs in libdl.so, but |
| 15 |
> > > i have no idea what exactly is wrong. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > > i suggest that for now you |
| 19 |
> > > (and gentoo) not compile this package as PIE. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > 1.1.2 was released on 2004-03-09 |
| 22 |
> > http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=358635 |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > I just added this to portage with use pie && append-flags -fno-pie to |
| 25 |
> > enable this workaround logic. |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Thanks for your help everyone, should I still submit a bug report? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Sure file one upstream with the guys at sourceforge, but before you do |
| 31 |
that try USE="-pie" and confirm it fails with 1.1.2 as well. Assuming |
| 32 |
the bug still exists then please post the sourceforge bug # when you |
| 33 |
have on so we may follow the progress. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Barry |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 40 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |
Archives