| 1 |
On 19/04/2010 21:12, Guillaume Castagnino wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:46:57, Kerin Millar a écrit : |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> They've been moved into anarchy's personal overlay: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/anarchy.git;a=commit;h=a4802d1 |
| 7 |
>> 087c90a1371c15de195282c4601428dbe |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> I really do NOT understand this move. |
| 10 |
> We had a centralized place where we could find ALL the hardened developpement. |
| 11 |
> This was quite good, even if we could consider ~arch as a better place. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Now we have to add one more overlay, containing some peace of ebuild that do |
| 14 |
> not concern hardened at all (fprint is an other story)... |
| 15 |
> What will be the next step ? Each dev will add his overlay ? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> From the user point of view, this is becoming harder to maintain... How many |
| 18 |
> overlays will we have to add ? With even more mess on packages that do not |
| 19 |
> concern hardened at all... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Please, keep ONE hardened overlay where all the devs take place ! |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Obviously without knowing anything further about the move I would tend |
| 27 |
to agree, but perhaps: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
- "anarchy" could explain the reasoning? Most likely there is some sane |
| 30 |
reason for this? |
| 31 |
- If such changes are made to the hardened project they could be |
| 32 |
announced to the -hardened list? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I'm rather hoping that the hardened overlay has the potential to go away |
| 36 |
at some point soon and all the changes absorbed into mainstream? I get |
| 37 |
the impression that the size of the overlay is shrinking slowly (which |
| 38 |
is good in my opinion...)? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Good luck all |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Ed W |
Archives