Archives
Archives
| From: | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:47:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1154382202.31734.9.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 14:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | > On Monday 31 July 2006 11:28, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 3 | > > gcc-4.x and hardened are not in the works.. |
| 4 | > > We are undecided at this time how much we wish to pursue that avenue. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > it's going to happen or Gentoo/hardened is going to die, simple as that |
| 7 | |
| 8 | See other subthread. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 12 | Gentoo Linux |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |