Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:21:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200607311418.04550.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? by Ned Ludd |
||
| 1 | On Monday 31 July 2006 11:28, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 | > gcc-4.x and hardened are not in the works.. |
| 3 | > We are undecided at this time how much we wish to pursue that avenue. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | it's going to happen or Gentoo/hardened is going to die, simple as that |
| 6 | -mike |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |