| 1 |
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 15:51 +0200, Jure Varlec wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm building a new server. I decided to go with hardened gentoo to learn a bit |
| 5 |
> more about working with tightened security. So I subscribed to this mailing |
| 6 |
> list and this thread is the first I got :) . Quite appropriate. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> On Monday 31 July 2006 00:35, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 9 |
> > dont waste your time on gcc-3.x |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Please tell me then, is hardened gcc 4.1 the way to go? I'd like to know that |
| 12 |
> while I'm still early in the install process. I've been running 4.1 on my |
| 13 |
> laptop for a while now so I know it works very well normally, but I don't |
| 14 |
> know how it handles hardened patches. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
gcc-4.x and hardened are not in the works.. |
| 17 |
We are undecided at this time how much we wish to pursue that avenue. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives