Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Jure Varlec <exzombie@×××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness?
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:51:00
Message-Id: 200607311551.07968.exzombie@exzombie.homeip.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? by Mike Frysinger
1 Hello
2
3 I'm building a new server. I decided to go with hardened gentoo to learn a bit
4 more about working with tightened security. So I subscribed to this mailing
5 list and this thread is the first I got :) . Quite appropriate.
6
7 On Monday 31 July 2006 00:35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
8 > dont waste your time on gcc-3.x
9
10 Please tell me then, is hardened gcc 4.1 the way to go? I'd like to know that
11 while I'm still early in the install process. I've been running 4.1 on my
12 laptop for a while now so I know it works very well normally, but I don't
13 know how it handles hardened patches.
14
15 Thank you
16 --
17 Jure Varlec

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>