Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | Richard Hansen <gentoo-a7x@×××××××××××.org> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:37:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200607301835.04351.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? by Richard Hansen |
||
| 1 | On Saturday 29 July 2006 17:37, Richard Hansen wrote: |
| 2 | > I'm trying to figure out a bug in Ethereal/Wireshark that appears only when |
| 3 | > it is compiled with a gcc profile that has SSP turned on. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | dont waste your time on gcc-3.x |
| 6 | |
| 7 | if wireshark still shits the bed with gcc-4.1.1 + SSP, then file a new bug in |
| 8 | our bugzilla and assign it to the toolchain team |
| 9 | -mike |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| RE: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? | Richard Hansen <gentoo-a7x@×××××××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? | Jure Varlec <exzombie@×××××××××××××××.net> |