| 1 |
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Boyd Waters wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 7 |
> | Is there any reason that these two types of setups (mikes, and what your |
| 8 |
> | working on) could no coexist? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I would very much like for us to all come up with a system that we want; |
| 11 |
> we should converge on something, I think. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The difference between my system and Mike's ATM is that Mike's seems to |
| 14 |
> work for him :-) ... mine does not. Mine works for 2.4 and not for 2.6 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Are you using Loop-AES? I have been using cryptoapi with 2.4, but I have not |
| 17 |
tried it with 2.6 yet. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
For background, my setup is an encrypted root with an initrd system |
| 20 |
loosely based on the loop-aes initrd, but with the addition of busybox |
| 21 |
and my own 'rootsetup' script (which loads the USB drivers and such). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Looking at this right now... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Cheers, |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> - - boyd |
| 28 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> iD8DBQE/SpiH0is8k1r0QeURAqz7AJwNSs5MA6YOyPFHYJW+NwWITq116wCfexLQ |
| 33 |
> +K2tIA0U0FeqQaxM3JYC0Lc= |
| 34 |
> =8w+b |
| 35 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -- |
| 39 |
> gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
:wq |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives