| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 5 |
| Is there any reason that these two types of setups (mikes, and what your |
| 6 |
| working on) could no coexist? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I would very much like for us to all come up with a system that we want; |
| 9 |
we should converge on something, I think. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The difference between my system and Mike's ATM is that Mike's seems to |
| 12 |
work for him :-) ... mine does not. Mine works for 2.4 and not for 2.6 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Looking at this right now... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- - boyd |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQE/SpiH0is8k1r0QeURAqz7AJwNSs5MA6YOyPFHYJW+NwWITq116wCfexLQ |
| 24 |
+K2tIA0U0FeqQaxM3JYC0Lc= |
| 25 |
=8w+b |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives