1 |
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 11:47 -0700, RB wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:07, Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > RB schrieb: |
4 |
> > I have KVM + hardened toolchain + hardened-sources running without problems for a longer time now. |
5 |
> > Probably the main differences: |
6 |
> > -I am using the experimental hardened toolchain overlay from Zorry and xake. |
7 |
> > -I am using the in-kernel kvm-modules instead of those provided by kvm (compiled in, not as module). |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The only real difference, then, is the toolchain - I'm running the |
10 |
> ~amd64 (hardened) gcc-4.3.2-r2 from the main tree and the |
11 |
> hardened/linux/amd64/2008.0/server profile on the latest (2.6.27-r3) |
12 |
> hardened-sources. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Can anyone elucidate the difference between the Zorry/xake toolchain |
15 |
> and the one Solar was working on last month? |
16 |
|
17 |
There is no "by default" SSP support in whats in the main tree at this |
18 |
point. gengor will be working with Zorry over time to get that SSP |
19 |
implementation tree worthy. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
24 |
Gentoo Linux |