Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: security mailing lists <security@××××××××××.com>
To: Matt Rickard <frogger@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-hardened@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] pwdb+pam+propolice failure
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:01:43
Message-Id: 1060362096.23310.1.camel@skinny.gideonolam.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] pwdb+pam+propolice failure by Matt Rickard
1 On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 10:55, Matt Rickard wrote:
2 > > I don't see anything on bugs.gentoo.com for problems with pam and
3 > > stack protection, just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something
4 > > before I submitted the bug. The gentoo propolice project website says
5 > > that things should compile out of the box with the proper gcc/glibc
6 > > used above.
7 >
8 > Bug 23934 <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23934> addresses this
9 > issue. Please add comments there if you have any more information.
10 >
11 > --
12 > Matt Rickard
13 > frogger@g.o
14 >
15 > --
16 > gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list
17 >
18
19 Missed that in my bug search somehow, sorry. Thanks for the bug id.
20
21 -Joe
22
23 --
24 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list