Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Rickard <frogger@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gideon@××××××××××.com | ||
| Cc: | security@××××××××××.com, gentoo-hardened@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] pwdb+pam+propolice failure | ||
| Date: | Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:57:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20030808125538.11221506.frogger@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] pwdb+pam+propolice failure by security mailing lists |
||
| 1 | > I don't see anything on bugs.gentoo.com for problems with pam and |
| 2 | > stack protection, just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something |
| 3 | > before I submitted the bug. The gentoo propolice project website says |
| 4 | > that things should compile out of the box with the proper gcc/glibc |
| 5 | > used above. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Bug 23934 <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23934> addresses this |
| 8 | issue. Please add comments there if you have any more information. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Matt Rickard |
| 12 | frogger@g.o |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] pwdb+pam+propolice failure | security mailing lists <security@××××××××××.com> |