Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Chris PeBenito <pebenito@g.o>
To: Hardened Gentoo Mail List <gentoo-hardened@××××××××××××.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] problem with new policies?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:33:35
Message-Id: 1112312012.9664.2.camel@chris.pebenito.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] problem with new policies? by Roel Vromen
1 On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 23:27 +0200, Roel Vromen wrote:
2 > but that doesn't seem to do anything in my case:
3 >
4 > make after make clean still gives a load of messages such as:
5 > -------
6 > #line 18
7 > domains/admin.te:18:ERROR 'permission connected_socket_perms is not defined
8 > forclass tcp_socket' at token ';' on line 4297:
9 > allow sysadm_mail_t self:tcp_socket connected_socket_perms;
10 > ------
11
12 I'm assuming you're using selinux-base-policy-20050322. I doublechecked
13 the tarball, and it is in macros/core_macros.te. So if its not
14 existing, then either your policy is broken, or you didn't etc-update.
15
16 --
17 Chris PeBenito
18 <pebenito@g.o>
19 Developer,
20 Hardened Gentoo Linux
21 Embedded Gentoo Linux
22
23 Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243
24 Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] problem with new policies? Roel Vromen <roel@××××××.net>