1 |
On Friday 01 April 2005 01:33, Chris PeBenito wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 23:27 +0200, Roel Vromen wrote: |
3 |
> > but that doesn't seem to do anything in my case: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > make after make clean still gives a load of messages such as: |
6 |
> > ------- |
7 |
> > #line 18 |
8 |
> > domains/admin.te:18:ERROR 'permission connected_socket_perms is not |
9 |
> > defined forclass tcp_socket' at token ';' on line 4297: |
10 |
> > allow sysadm_mail_t self:tcp_socket connected_socket_perms; |
11 |
> > ------ |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I'm assuming you're using selinux-base-policy-20050322. I doublechecked |
14 |
> the tarball, and it is in macros/core_macros.te. So if its not |
15 |
> existing, then either your policy is broken, or you didn't etc-update. |
16 |
|
17 |
You were so right! The selinux-base-policy was in a series of updates. |
18 |
|
19 |
Probably better if I spot a selinux-base-policy update to do a separate merge |
20 |
(complete with the etc-update) for that one, and only THEN do the emerge -uD |
21 |
world. |
22 |
|
23 |
Thanks for taking the time to answer my question. Very much appreciated. |
24 |
|
25 |
Roel |