| 1 |
On 06/11/2012 01:20 AM, Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/06/12 04:26, Jens Kasten wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Am 2012-06-08 22:32, schrieb Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón: |
| 6 |
>>> On 08/06/12 21:40, Kevin Chadwick wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:37 +0300 |
| 8 |
>>>> Alex Efros wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> Actually, I see no reasons to NOT use hardened on desktops. |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> Maybe many more would if there was an easy and quick to install and |
| 13 |
>>>> maintain compiled distro. More users more compatibility too, I'd guess. |
| 14 |
>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>> Not suggesting there should be, just stating a reality. |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>> Anyone know why hardened debian and was it adamantix died off? |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> Hardened debian had to change their name by adamantix because debian |
| 21 |
>>> forbid the use of his name. |
| 22 |
>>> It dissapeared because hardened gentoo appeared, and one distro |
| 23 |
>>> maintained by one user (Peter Busser) is a hard and crazy task. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> Hmm because gentoo hardened? I am not sure about that. |
| 26 |
>> Adamantix was RSBAC specific not grsecurity or SELinux. |
| 27 |
>> I switch to gentoo hardened after adamantix was not maintained anymore. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Hi Jens, Yes, I'm sure, the main goal of adamantix was to create a |
| 31 |
> distribution with PIE and SSP to use over a rsbac kernel, goal that made |
| 32 |
> hardened gentoo later. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> At the beginning rsbac was supported in gentoo and maintained by Kang. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I'm supporting it again. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. |
| 41 |
Chair of Information Technology |
| 42 |
D'Youville College |
| 43 |
Buffalo, NY 14201 |
| 44 |
(716) 829-8197 |
Archives