| 1 |
On 11/06/12 04:26, Jens Kasten wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Am 2012-06-08 22:32, schrieb Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón: |
| 5 |
>> On 08/06/12 21:40, Kevin Chadwick wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:37 +0300 |
| 7 |
>>> Alex Efros wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> Actually, I see no reasons to NOT use hardened on desktops. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Maybe many more would if there was an easy and quick to install and |
| 12 |
>>> maintain compiled distro. More users more compatibility too, I'd guess. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Not suggesting there should be, just stating a reality. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> Anyone know why hardened debian and was it adamantix died off? |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Hardened debian had to change their name by adamantix because debian |
| 20 |
>> forbid the use of his name. |
| 21 |
>> It dissapeared because hardened gentoo appeared, and one distro |
| 22 |
>> maintained by one user (Peter Busser) is a hard and crazy task. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Hmm because gentoo hardened? I am not sure about that. |
| 25 |
> Adamantix was RSBAC specific not grsecurity or SELinux. |
| 26 |
> I switch to gentoo hardened after adamantix was not maintained anymore. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Hi Jens, Yes, I'm sure, the main goal of adamantix was to create a |
| 30 |
distribution with PIE and SSP to use over a rsbac kernel, goal that made |
| 31 |
hardened gentoo later. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
At the beginning rsbac was supported in gentoo and maintained by Kang. |
Archives