Archives
Archives
| From: | pageexec@××××××××.hu | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | tinhat@××××××××××××××.edu, gentoo-hardened@l.g.o, hardened-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Tin Hat 20091218 is out! | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:33:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4B354B3F.22330.7D30C17@pageexec.freemail.hu | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] Tin Hat 20091218 is out! by basile |
||
| 1 | On 21 Dec 2009 at 9:38, basile wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Tobias Klein from trapkit.de was kind enough to allow us to bundle his |
| 4 | > checksec.sh script which tests system binaries or running processes for |
| 5 | > relro, ssp, nx, pie and aslr. Every binary shows these hardening |
| 6 | > features enabled except X and evolution which have only partial relro. |
| 7 | > A comparison of a running Tin Hat system and a running Ubuntu system can |
| 8 | > be see at |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > http://opensource.dyc.edu/sites/default/files/karmic-checksec.txt |
| 11 | > http://opensource.dyc.edu/sites/default/files/tinhat-checksec.txt |
| 12 | |
| 13 | what are the causes for the partial RELRO results? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] Tin Hat 20091218 is out! | basile <basile@××××××××××××××.edu> |