Archives
Archives
| From: | "Krzysztof Kozłowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@×××××××××.pl> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Idea behind different ebuilds sec-policy/selinux-* | ||
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:34:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 466BEF63.5060709@kozik.net.pl | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Idea behind different ebuilds sec-policy/selinux-* by "Marek Wróbel" |
||
| 1 | Marek Wróbel wrote: |
| 2 | > But there are many modules that are included in refpolicy, but they are |
| 3 | > not packaged in gentoo packages and have to be installed by hand. You |
| 4 | > can make local portage overlay and create ebuilds for them. It isn't |
| 5 | > much work, because of selinux-policy-2 eclass. |
| 6 | I figured it out and I still wonder why such easy to write ebuilds are not in |
| 7 | Portage... Is there any reason for that? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Krzysztof Kozłowski |
| 11 | http://www.kozik.net.pl |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] Idea behind different ebuilds sec-policy/selinux-* | Matt Poletiek <chill550@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] Idea behind different ebuilds sec-policy/selinux-* | Petre Rodan <kaiowas@g.o> |