| 1 |
My guess would be that the man power behind Gentoo/Portage has their |
| 2 |
own priorities? In my opinion, developers with security as a top |
| 3 |
priority are still fairly obscure. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Can we say demand? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 6/10/07, Krzysztof Koz³owski <krzysztof.kozlowski@×××××××××.pl> wrote: |
| 8 |
> Marek Wróbel wrote: |
| 9 |
> > But there are many modules that are included in refpolicy, but they are |
| 10 |
> > not packaged in gentoo packages and have to be installed by hand. You |
| 11 |
> > can make local portage overlay and create ebuilds for them. It isn't |
| 12 |
> > much work, because of selinux-policy-2 eclass. |
| 13 |
> I figured it out and I still wonder why such easy to write ebuilds are not in |
| 14 |
> Portage... Is there any reason for that? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> -- |
| 17 |
> Krzysztof Koz³owski |
| 18 |
> http://www.kozik.net.pl |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Matthew Poletiek |
| 29 |
www.chill-fu.net |
Archives