1 |
On Friday, February 13, 2009 07:27:04 Thomas Sachau wrote: |
2 |
> Guillaume Castagnino schrieb: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I noticed this in hardened profile : |
6 |
> > # Mask off anything greater than glibc-2.6.x for now. |
7 |
> > # 2009-02-11 gengor |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> >> =sys-libs/glibc-2.7 |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Is there any good (means "critical") reason for this downgrade ? |
12 |
> > Because it causes problem with some packages that needs higher glibc |
13 |
> > version. For example : |
14 |
> > - iproute2 needs >=glibc-2.7 |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > ('installed', '/', 'sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1', 'nomerge') pulled |
19 |
> > in by |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > >=sys-libs/glibc-2.7 required by ('installed', '/', 'sys- |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > apps/iproute2-2.6.28', 'nomerge') |
24 |
> > (and 12 more) |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > Thanks for your feedback |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Regards, |
30 |
> > Guillaume |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I talked to gengor yesterday, so i just copy some lines from IRC: |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Feb 12 21:34:28 <gengor> Tommy[D]: because I haven't tested it against |
35 |
> stable + stable kernel. Feb 12 21:37:57 <gengor> its safe because stable |
36 |
> glibc (2.6.1) doesn't take advantage of any new API's between 2.6.{25,26} |
37 |
> -> 2.6.27. I don't know about the newer glibc though, hence the mask. Feb |
38 |
> 12 21:38:54 <gengor> it was fine to leave it that way when glibc was |
39 |
> unstable (because those who run unstable should know what they are doing |
40 |
> and be running unstable kernel too). But they're moving on glibc-2.8 |
41 |
> stabilization right now. |
42 |
> Feb 12 21:40:33 <gengor> and there are still some minor lingering issues w/ |
43 |
> 2.6.27 and 2.6.28 so I don't want to mark it stable yet. Although we're |
44 |
> getting to the point 2.6.26 is becoming out of date, not getting updates |
45 |
> from mainline and I don't have time for a bunch of backports this time |
46 |
> around - so my hand may be forced at some point. |
47 |
|
48 |
In the future please refrain from cutting and pasting select bits of |
49 |
conversation from IRC out of context. Or any IRC conversation for that |
50 |
matter. You don't even realize that the bits you selected for cut/paste |
51 |
don't even make sense w/o the other parts of the conversation. This is very |
52 |
fscking rude. |
53 |
|
54 |
To OP: If you've already upgraded your glibc then you've package.keyworded |
55 |
it, so why not just package.unmask it as well? You're not forced to |
56 |
downgrade. |