| 1 |
Le vendredi 13 février 2009, Gordon Malm a écrit : |
| 2 |
> To OP: If you've already upgraded your glibc then you've |
| 3 |
> package.keyworded it, so why not just package.unmask it as well? |
| 4 |
> You're not forced to downgrade. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Hi, |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
In fact, no: glibc-2.9 was allready keyworded on hardened ~x86 in the |
| 9 |
portage tree, and not masked until 2009-02-11. |
| 10 |
So ~x86 hardened was naturally upgraded to glibc 2.9 without any |
| 11 |
intervention. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I have no problem to package.unmask it, it's just to know what is the |
| 14 |
reason for this mask :) |
| 15 |
But keep in mind that for ~x86 hardened, this mask has a dependency |
| 16 |
problem, since ~x86 iproute2 depends on glibc that is now masked on |
| 17 |
~x86 hardened (and was not before 2009-02-11) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Guillaume Castagnino |
| 23 |
guilc@×××××××.net / casta@×××××.info |
Archives